Spending Extra Time: Labor or Leisure?

 

Takeaway

  • In shortened work weeks, people tend to spend more time watching TV and sleeping, and on personal care
  • Researchers found no increase in household production activities

By Jessica Sinn, College of Liberal Arts

Imagine what it would be like to shave 10 hours from your work week. How would you make the most out of your free time? Would you tackle that home improvement project? Attend to that pile of laundry? Or take a nap in the backyard hammock?

According to a new economics study, co-authored by Daniel Hamermesh, professor of economics at The University of Texas at Austin, people are more likely to put those household chores aside and practice the fine art of relaxation.

To examine how people respond to a permanent cut in work hours, Hamermesh and his colleagues examined data from national time-use diaries in Japan and Korea, two countries that imposed sharp decreases in standard work week hours. The data were collected before and after the changes went into effect.

The researchers broke up time allocations into four categories: Market work (studying, working, commuting to and from the office), household production (childcare, shopping, chores), tertiary activities (sleeping, grooming, eating, sex, medical treatment), and leisure (watching TV, socializing, attending sports events and many others).

Of all the activities, the researchers found channel surfing, snoozing and self-care were the main activities undertaken in the freed-up time.

Analyzing time-use data in Japan from 1976 to 2006, the economists found a significant increase in leisurely activities, particularly watching TV. In Korea, the data culled from 1999 to 2009 show a sharp increase in personal care, particularly grooming, among both men and women.

In both countries, the researchers found no increase in household production activities. Thanks to improvements in household appliances, Hamermesh said people are spending less time in the kitchen and more time enjoying life.

So what does this mean for workers in the United States, a nation known for its population of workaholics? Hamermesh suggests these findings lend insight into how people want to spend their precious free time — and how a shorter workweek can vastly improve the quality of life.

Studies have shown Americans work more hours than most European nations. Even on the weekends, they’re putting the axe to the grindstone instead of enjoying their downtime with friends and family. In addition to working more hours per week than those in other developed countries, Americans retire later and take much shorter vacations.

“Whether other countries would experience similar effects is not clear,” Hamermesh said. “But I like to think the same would occur in the United States — that we would use permanent cuts in work time to enjoy ourselves and take more care of ourselves. Regrettably in the workaholism champion of the Western world, these cuts don’t seem likely any time soon.”

The study, conducted together with Jungmin Lee, a University of Texas at Austin alumnus (Ph.D. economics, ’03) and associate professor of economics at Sogang University, Korea; and Daiji Kawaguchi, associate professor of economics at Hitotsubashi University, Japan, will be published in the May issue of the American Economic Review.

This story originally appeared on the Further Findings blog.

Mentioned in this Article

Daniel Hamermesh

Professor, Department of Economics College of Liberal Arts

Daniel S. Hamermesh is Sue Killam Professor in the Foundation of Economics at the University of Texas at Austin and Professor of Labor...

About The Author

TXE Staff

Staff, Texas Enterprise

The Texas Enterprise staff covers a broad swath of disciplines and interests. Writers, researchers, technicians and artists all contribute to the...

Comments

#1 Very interesting study. Allow

Very interesting study. Allow me to challenge a common myth that Dr. Hamermesh mentions at the end...the myth of Americans working harder and longer than the rest of the world. If studies compare" total time spent working per year" based on working hours or by comparing the average number of official vacations days internationally, that might be indeed the case. If you factor in true productivity during these hours (i.e., challenge the notion that an hour worked is the same no matter the country and culture), you might get different results: Based on my experience from working in Europe, Canada, South America, and the US, there is much more "consumption on the job" going on here in the US than, let's say, Germany. Germans might have many more vacations days (the famous 6 weeks paid holidays), but when on the job, they work. At the risk of generalizing, there is not much water cooler chit chat and there is no excuse for coming late by an hour because you needed to drop off your kids (if you have to do that, you have to take official vacation time, like taking half a day off). I am not saying that such an adjustment of counting true work hours will equalize everything (i.e, the US might still come out "ahead"), but just because notionally more hours are put in the US does not mean the intensity is the same. And I have not even talked about the issue of "face time" at work or trying to impress the boss by sending out senseless non-urgent emails over the weekend. I would argue that everybody needs time off, but the form might vary - concentrated in form of vacations (Europe) vs. spread out through "consumption on the job", being allowed to "work" Fridays from home, etc. (US).

Leave a comment

We want to hear from you! To keep discussions on-topic and constructive, comments are moderated for relevance and for abusive or profane language.

Login or register to post comments

User login